"Art is not a mirror help up to reality, but a hammer with which to shape it". Bertolt Brecht.
We looked at how power and status were depicted. James noted how in Britain, our royal family portray themselves with medals on every state occasion (accorded to them not by their actions, but by their status?) and travel in landaus which makes them noticeable because of their rarity. Then we looked Napoleon in his finery and Lenin in mundanity.
Ingres, Napoleon on his imperial throne |
Isaac Brodsky, Lenin in Smolsky |
We had a discussion about Karl Marx and his critique of the emerging capitalist economy. He argued that artistic production is merely another form of economic production via the commodification of labour. This labour force held the seeds of its own destruction - 60% of low grade people could overthrow the Bourgoise. In capitalism the benefits go to the owner.
The avant garde made subversive, questioning art. Visual communication - done by creative thinking. Queried why the Bolshovists were in charge. Stalin did not want these questions. State patronage art in the USSR went back to technical accomplishment. Moved away from abstraction. Social Realism came in to vogue - restricted range - humble and mundane.
Antonio Gramsci - cultural hegemony (a control system). The soft power of cultural influence is just as important as the hard power of force.
Georg Grosz - The artist must try to express the workers battle idea and measure the value of his work by its social value and effectiveness.
Look at John Berger Ways of Seeing. He had a Marxist interpretation.
No comments:
Post a Comment